In the absence of a chairman for four months, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority ( IRDAI) Monday constituted a committee to review licence applications from two proposed general insurers, people familiar with the matter said.
The proposals are from a venture backed by the M Pallonji Group and another by the WestBridge Capital backed Kiwi General Insurance.
The panel, comprising IRDAI's member (life), member (non-Life), and member (actuary), was formed earlier Monday and would scrutinise the eligibility of both applicants, said the sources cited above.
This formation of the committee comes after delays in clearing a new insurance license since IRDAI chairman Debasish Panda's superannuation mid-March.
"R1 applications are usually approved at the chairman's level and are not formally taken up in authority meetings," said a source. "In the absence of a chairman, a committee has been set up to examine these proposals."
The proposals are from a venture backed by the M Pallonji Group and another by the WestBridge Capital backed Kiwi General Insurance.
The panel, comprising IRDAI's member (life), member (non-Life), and member (actuary), was formed earlier Monday and would scrutinise the eligibility of both applicants, said the sources cited above.
This formation of the committee comes after delays in clearing a new insurance license since IRDAI chairman Debasish Panda's superannuation mid-March.
"R1 applications are usually approved at the chairman's level and are not formally taken up in authority meetings," said a source. "In the absence of a chairman, a committee has been set up to examine these proposals."
You may also like
Toll may be halved for 2-lane national highways undergoing expansion
AI171 crash: Probe gives 'clarity yet spurs new questions', says Air India CEO
Mumbai Crime Branch Busts Illegal Firearms Racket; 2 Uttar Pradesh Men Arrested With Pistols Near Chedda Nagar In Ghatkopar
Major update as girl who fell overboard from Disney Cruise is SAVED by hero dad
Private chat recorded by spouse admissible as evidence, says Supreme Court